home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.NetVision.net.il!news
- From: mrktg@LearnSkills.com (S. Vexler)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Basic or C++?
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 01:54:23 GMT
- Organization: @LearnSkills.com - online Internet training
- Message-ID: <4e9csm$9l1@news.NetVision.net.il>
- References: <4dm8oo$1im@gulfa.kuwait.net> <4e1nt8$qcn@usenet4.interramp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts2bp8.netvision.net.il
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- visualware@interramp.com (John M. Miano) wrote:
-
- >In article <4dm8oo$1im@gulfa.kuwait.net>, leec@kuwait.net says...
- >>
- >>Which programming language is more widespread in the PC world - is it Visual
- >>Basic or Visual C++?
-
- Widespread? I can't believe it would (today) be anything but C++ !
-
- >>Which is easier to learn?
-
- >Next to Ada and Lisp, C++ is probably the hardest programming language
- >to learn that is in the mainstream.
-
- >So that means the answer is BASIC.
-
- >John
-
- I couldn't disagree more. Perhaps if you a procedual programmer
- making the move to Object Oriented programming . . . but if you are
- learning it as your first language, properly taught, C++ isn't any
- more difficult than any other 'first' programming language. In fact
- it is our experience that novice programmers succeed in accomplishing
- more sophisticated tasks earlier in C++ that other languages we have
- taught!
-
-
- S. Vexler
- Marketing Coordinator
- @LearnSkills.com
-
- http://www.LearnSkills.com
-
-